Clinical characterization and outcomes of impulse oscillometry-defined bronchodilator response: an ECOPD cohort-based study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of the impulse oscillometry-defined small airway bronchodilator response (IOS-BDR) is not well-known. Accordingly, this study investigated the clinical characteristics of IOS-BDR and explored the association between lung function decline, acute respiratory exacerbations, and IOS-BDR. METHODS: Participants were recruited from an Early Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (ECOPD) cohort subset and were followed up for two years with visits at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was defined as a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio < 0.70. IOS-BDR was defined as meeting any one of the following criteria: an absolute change in respiratory system resistance at 5 Hz ≤ - 0.137 kPa/L/s, an absolute change in respiratory system reactance at 5 Hz ≥ 0.055 kPa/L/s, or an absolute change in reactance area ≤ - 0.390 kPa/L. The association between IOS-BDR and a decline in lung function was explored with linear mixed-effects model. The association between IOS-BDR and the risk of acute respiratory exacerbations at the two-year follow-up was analyzed with the logistic regression model. RESULTS: This study involved 466 participants (92 participants with IOS-BDR and 374 participants without IOS-BDR). Participants with IOS-BDR had higher COPD assessment test and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale scores, more severe emphysema, air trapping, and rapid decline in FVC than those without IOS-BDR over 2-year follow-up. IOS-BDR was not associated with the risk of acute respiratory exacerbations at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The participants with IOS-BDR had more respiratory symptoms, radiographic structural changes, and had an increase in decline in lung function than those without IOS-BDR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900024643. Registered on 19 July, 2019.

Characteristics of inflammatory phenotypes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and clinical characteristics remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the airway inflammatory phenotypes in COPD and their association with clinical characteristics. METHODS: 895 patients with COPD were recruited from Guangdong Province, China in this study. Each patient underwent questionnaire interviews, spirometry testing, CT scans and induced sputum examination. Classification of airway inflammation phenotypes was based on sputum inflammatory cell counts. Covariance analysis was applied to assess associations with airway inflammation phenotypes. RESULTS: In this study, we found that neutrophilic phenotype (NP, 58.0%) was the most common airway inflammation phenotype in patients with COPD, followed by mixed granulocytic phenotype (MGP, 32.6%), eosinophilic phenotype (EP, 5.4%) and paucigranulocytic phenotype (PP, 4.0%). Compared with NP patients, those with MGP exhibited more frequent chronic respiratory symptoms, and a higher proportion of individuals classified under Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stages 3 and 4. After adjusting for confounding factors, MGP patients had lower lung function, and more severe emphysema and air trapping. On the contrary, patients with PP had the best pulmonary function and less emphysema and air trapping. CONCLUSIONS: NP was the most common airway inflammation phenotype in patients with COPD. Patients with MGP had more respiratory symptoms, greater loss of lung function, and more severe emphysema and gas trapping compared with those with NP. Meanwhile, PP may be a phenotype of mild damage to lung structure in patients with COPD.

Clinical features and 1-year outcomes of chronic bronchitis in participants with normal spirometry: results from the ECOPD study in China.

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding clinical features and outcomes of individuals with non-obstructive chronic bronchitis (NOCB) remains scarce, especially in never-smokers. We aimed to investigate the clinical features and 1-year outcomes of individuals with NOCB in the Chinese population. METHODS: We obtained data on participants in the Early Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Study who had normal spirometry (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ≥0.70). NOCB was defined as chronic cough and sputum production for at least 3 months for two consecutive years or more at baseline in participants with normal spirometry. We assessed the differences in demographics, risk factors, lung function, impulse oscillometry, CT imaging and frequency of acute respiratory events between participants with and without NOCB. RESULTS: NOCB was present in 13.1% (149/1140) of participants with normal spirometry at baseline. Compared with participants without NOCB, those with NOCB had a higher proportion of men and participants with smoke exposure, occupational exposure, family history of respiratory diseases and worse respiratory symptoms (all p<0.05), but there was no significant difference in lung function. Never-smokers with NOCB had higher rates of emphysema than those without NOCB, but airway resistance was similar. Ever-smokers with NOCB had greater airway resistance than those without NOCB, but emphysema rates were similar. During 1-year follow-up, participants with NOCB had a significantly increased risk of acute respiratory events compared with participants who did not have NOCB, after adjustment for confounders (risk ratio 2.10, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.33; p=0.002). These results were robust in never-smokers and ever-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Never-smokers and ever-smokers with NOCB had more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-related risk factors, evidence of airway disease and greater risk of acute respiratory events than those without NOCB. Our findings support expanding the criteria defining pre-COPD to include NOCB.

Clinical characteristics of airway impairment assessed by impulse oscillometry in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: findings from the ECOPD study in China.

BACKGROUND: The role of airway impairment assessed by impulse oscillometry (IOS) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the proportion and clinical characteristics of airway impairment assessed by IOS across COPD severities, and explore whether airway impairment is a subtype of COPD. METHODS: This study was based on cross-sectional data from the ECOPD cohort in Guangdong, China. Subjects were consecutively recruited from July 2019 to August 2021. They filled out questionnaires and underwent lung function tests, IOS and computed tomography (CT). COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity < lower limit of normal (LLN). Meanwhile, airway impairment was defined as IOS parameters > upper limit of normal or < LLN. On the one hand, Poisson regression was employed to analyze the associations between acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) in the previous year and airway impairment. On the other hand, logistic regression was used to assess differences in CT imaging between patients with IOS parameters' abnormalities and patients with normal IOS parameters. RESULTS: 768 COPD subjects were finally enrolled in the study. The proportion of airway impairment assessed by R5, R20, R5-R20, X5, AX, and Fres was 59.8%, 29.7%, 62.5%, 52.9%, 60.9% and 67.3%, respectively. Airway impairment assessed by IOS parameters (R5, R5-R20, X5, AX, and Fres) in patients with COPD was present across all severities of COPD, particularly in GOLD 3-4 patients. Compared with patients with normal IOS parameters, patients with IOS parameters' abnormalities had more respiratory symptoms, more severe airway obstruction and imaging structural abnormalities. Patients with IOS parameters' abnormalities assessed by R5 [risk ratio (RR): 1.58, 95% confidential interval (CI): 1.13-2.19, P = 0.007], R5-R20 [RR: 1.73, 95%CI: 1.22-2.45, P = 0.002], X5 [RR: 2.11, 95%CI: 1.51-2.95, P < 0.001], AX [RR: 2.20, 95%CI: 1.53-3.16, P < 0.001], and Fres [RR: 2.13, 95%CI: 1.44-3.15, P < 0.001] had a higher risk of AECOPD in the previous year than patients with normal IOS parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Airway impairment assessed by IOS may be a subtype of COPD. Future studies are warranted to identify the underlying mechanisms and longitudinal progression of airway impairment.

Preserved ratio impaired spirometry is associated with small airway dysfunction and reduced total lung capacity.

BACKGROUND: Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) refers to decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in the setting of preserved ratio. Little is known about the role of PRISm and its complex relation with small airway dysfunction (SAD) and lung volume. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the associations between PRISm and SAD and lung volume. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional community-dwelling study in China. Demographic data, standard respiratory epidemiology questionnaire, spirometry, impulse oscillometry (IOS) and computed tomography (CT) data were collected. PRISm was defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.70 and FEV1 < 80% predicted. Spirometry-defined SAD was defined as at least two of three of the post-bronchodilator maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), forced expiratory flow 50% (FEF50), and forced expiratory flow 75% (FEF75) less than 65% of predicted. IOS-defined SAD and CT-defined gas trapping were defined by the fact that the cutoff value of peripheral airway resistance R5-R20 > 0.07 kPa/L/s and LAA- 856>20%, respectively. Analysis of covariance and logistic regression were used to determine associations between PRISm and SAD and lung volume. We then repeated the analysis with a lower limit of normal definition of spirometry criteria and FVC definition of PRISm. Moreover, we also performed subgroup analyses in ever smoker, never smoker, subjects without airway reversibility or self-reported diagnosed asthma, and subjects with CT-measured total lung capacity ≥70% of predicted. RESULTS: The final analysis included 1439 subjects. PRISm had higher odds and more severity in spirometry-defined SAD (pre-bronchodilator: odds ratio [OR]: 5.99, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 3.87-9.27, P < 0.001; post-bronchodilator: OR: 14.05, 95%CI: 8.88-22.24, P < 0.001), IOS-defined SAD (OR: 2.89, 95%CI: 1.82-4.58, P < 0.001), and CT-air trapping (OR: 2.01, 95%CI: 1.08-3.72, P = 0.027) compared with healthy control after adjustment for confounding factors. CT-measured total lung capacity in PRISm was lower than that in healthy controls (4.15 ± 0.98 vs. 4.78 ± 1.05 L, P < 0.05), after adjustment. These results were robust in repeating analyses and subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: Our finding revealed that PRISm was associated with SAD and reduced total lung capacity. Future studies to identify the underlying mechanisms and longitudinal progression of PRISm are warranted.

The association between small airway dysfunction and aging: a cross-sectional analysis from the ECOPD cohort.

BACKGROUND: Aging has been evidenced to bring about some structural and functional lung changes, especially in COPD. However, whether aging affects SAD, a possible precursor of COPD, has not been well characterized. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to comprehensively assess the relationship between aging and SAD from computed tomography, impulse oscillometry, and spirometry perspectives in Chinese. METHODS: We included 1859 participants from ECOPD, and used a linear-by-linear association test for evaluating the prevalence of SAD across various age subgroups, and multivariate regression models for determining the impact of age on the risk and severity of SAD. We then repeated the analyses in these subjects stratified by airflow limitation. RESULTS: The prevalence of SAD increases over aging regardless of definitional methods. After adjustment for other confounding factors, per 10-yrs increase in age was significantly associated with the risk of CT-defined SAD (OR 2.57, 95% CI 2.13 to 3.10) and the increase in the severity of air trapping (ß 2.09, 95% CI - 0.06 to 4.25 for LAA-856), airway reactance (ß - 0.02, 95% CI - 0.04 to - 0.01 for X5; ß 0.30, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.47 for AX; ß 1.75, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.66 for Fres), as well as the decrease in expiratory flow rates (ß - 3.95, 95% CI - 6.19 to - 1.71 for MMEF%predicted; ß - 5.42, 95% CI - 7.88 to - 2.95 for FEF50%predicted) for SAD. All these associations were generally maintained in SAD defined by IOS or spirometry. After stratification of airflow limitation, we further found that the effect of age on LAA-856 was the most significant among almost all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Aging is significantly associated with the prevalence, increased risk, as well as worse severity of SAD. CT may be a more optimal measure to assess aging-related SAD. The molecular mechanisms for the role of aging in SAD need to be explored in the future. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900024643. Registered on 19 July 2019.

Discordant Spirometry and Impulse Oscillometry Assessments in the Diagnosis of Small Airway Dysfunction.

Background and objective: Spirometry is commonly used to assess small airway dysfunction (SAD). Impulse oscillometry (IOS) can complement spirometry. However, discordant spirometry and IOS in the diagnosis of SAD were not uncommon. We examined the association between spirometry and IOS within a large cohort of subjects to identify variables that may explain discordant spirometry and IOS findings. Methods: 1,836 subjects from the ECOPD cohort underwent questionnaires, symptom scores, spirometry, and IOS, and 1,318 subjects were examined by CT. We assessed SAD with R5-R20 > the upper limit of normal (ULN) by IOS and two of the three spirometry indexes (maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), forced expiratory flow (FEF)50%, and FEF75%) < 65% predicted. Multivariate regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with SAD diagnosed by only spirometry but not IOS (spirometry-only SAD) and only IOS but not spirometry (IOS-only SAD), and line regression was used to assess CT imaging differences. Results: There was a slight agreement between spirometry and IOS in the diagnosis of SAD (kappa 0.322, p < 0.001). Smoking status, phlegm, drug treatment, and family history of respiratory disease were factors leading to spirometry-only SAD. Spirometry-only SAD had more severe emphysema and gas-trapping than IOS-only SAD in abnormal lung function. However, in normal lung function subjects, there was no statistical difference in emphysema and gas-trapping between discordant groups. The number of IOS-only SAD was nearly twice than that of spirometry. Conclusion: IOS may be more sensitive than spirometry in the diagnosis of SAD in normal lung function subjects. But in patients with abnormal lung function, spirometry may be more sensitive than IOS to detect SAD patients with clinical symptoms and CT lesions.

Corrigendum: Discordant spirometry and impulse oscillometry assessments in the diagnosis of small airway dysfunction.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.892448.].